N22-2-ENG-B-SLP1-ENG-TZ0-XX

keycap-digit-one.png

Keycap Digit One

Paper 1

Question 1 - MaximumMarks -30

You belong to an online group interested in languages. One member has said that they feel different when speaking English to speaking in their home language. You wish to express your opinions to the group. Write a text to summarize the member's ideas, compare them to your own experiences, and express your own ideas about the relationship between language and identity.Choose ONE of the text types from the options below.<ul><li>Email</li><li>Interview</li><li>Online forum posting</li></ul>

Question 1 - Answer

ONLINE FORUM POSTING Username: GlobalLinguist22 Topic: Response to Maria's post about language and identity Dear Language Enthusiasts, I've been following our recent discussions with great interest, and Maria's post about feeling like a different person when speaking English versus her native Portuguese really resonated with me. Maria eloquently described how she feels more formal and reserved when speaking English, whereas in Portuguese, she experiences greater emotional fluency and authenticity. She mentioned specific examples, like how humor doesn't translate easily between languages, and how certain concepts in Portuguese simply don't have English equivalents that capture the same cultural nuances. Maria's observation that she gestures less when speaking English and adopts different facial expressions was particularly fascinating. As she put it, "It's almost like wearing different clothes for different occasions – my English-speaking self is my professional blazer, while my Portuguese self is my comfortable weekend attire." Her experiences mirror many of my own. As someone who grew up speaking Mandarin at home but received my education primarily in English, I've often felt this linguistic duality that Maria describes. When I speak Mandarin with my family, there's an intimacy and emotional depth that comes naturally. Certain phrases, especially terms of endearment or expressions of frustration, simply feel more authentic in Mandarin. There's a richness to familiar idioms and cultural references that doesn't translate directly. In English, I've noticed that I present myself differently – perhaps more analytically and with greater precision when discussing academic or professional topics. Yet I sometimes struggle to express certain emotional nuances that come effortlessly in Mandarin. Like Maria, I find myself gesturing differently, and even my tone of voice shifts between languages. This phenomenon extends beyond just communication style. I believe language fundamentally shapes our identity and worldview. The languages we speak influence how we conceptualize time, categorize objects, and even process emotions. For instance, Mandarin's lack of tenses affects how I perceive time compared to English's strict temporal distinctions. Research in psycholinguistics supports this idea that language shapes thought patterns – what linguists call the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. I think multilingual individuals develop distinct facets of identity associated with each language. It's not necessarily that we become different people, but rather that different languages access and emphasize various aspects of our personality. This is especially true when languages are acquired in different contexts – a home language carries family dynamics and cultural heritage, while a second language might be associated with education, professional advancement, or specific social circles. The beauty of being multilingual is precisely this ability to navigate between different linguistic worlds and access multiple perspectives. Rather than seeing this as fragmentation, I view it as an enrichment of identity. Each language offers unique tools for understanding and expressing ourselves. I'm curious about others' experiences. Do you find that certain emotions or ideas are easier to express in one language than another? Have you noticed how your personality seems to shift subtly depending on which language you're speaking? And for those who have lived in different countries, how does the immersive experience of a language in its cultural context differ from learning it in a classroom? Looking forward to continuing this fascinating conversation! Warm regards, GlobalLinguist22

Question 1 - Answer - EC

The candidate demonstrates exceptional understanding of the task requirements, effectively summarizing another member's views while connecting them to personal experiences. The response explores language and identity with depth and nuance, showing sophisticated linguistic analysis. The forum posting maintains appropriate register and format throughout, with a logical structure that progresses naturally from summary to personal reflection to broader analysis.

Question 2 - MaximumMarks -30

You read an article which claims that cities are responsible for most of the world's carbon emissions. You feel your city could be doing more. Write a text for your fellow citizens in which you describe one source of carbon emissions within your city, present measures to reduce the pollution it causes, and explain why the measures would benefit the population.Choose ONE of the text types from the options below.<ul><li>Interview</li><li>Online forum posting</li><li>Set of guidelines</li></ul>

Question 2 - Answer

SET OF GUIDELINES GREENER CITY INITIATIVE: TACKLING TRAFFIC EMISSIONS Introduction: Why These Guidelines MatterRecent studies have confirmed that urban areas contribute to over 70% of global carbon emissions, with our city being no exception. Among the various sources, vehicular traffic stands as one of the largest contributors to our carbon footprint. These guidelines have been developed to address traffic-related emissions specifically and provide practical measures that all citizens can implement. By following these recommendations, we can collectively reduce our city's pollution levels, improve air quality, and create a healthier living environment for everyone. 1. Understanding Traffic-Related Carbon Emissions in Our City<ul><li>Our city experiences approximately 120,000 vehicle movements daily, producing an estimated 1,200 tons of CO2.</li><li>Peak hour congestion (7-9 AM and 4-6 PM) accounts for 45% of all traffic-related emissions.</li><li>Private vehicles with single occupants make up 68% of all traffic, despite being the least efficient mode of transportation per passenger.</li><li>Idling vehicles at traffic signals alone contribute to approximately 15% of total traffic emissions.</li></ul> 2. Immediate Measures for Individual Citizens<ul><li>Utilize public transportation: Commit to using buses, trains, or trams at least twice per week to reduce individual carbon footprints by up to 30%.</li><li>Adopt carpooling: Connect with neighbors and colleagues through the City Ride-Share App to coordinate shared trips to common destinations.</li><li>Practice eco-driving: Maintain steady speeds, avoid excessive acceleration and braking, and turn off engines when stopped for more than 30 seconds.</li><li>Consider cycling or walking: For journeys under 5km, use the newly expanded city bike lanes and pedestrian pathways.</li><li>Regular vehicle maintenance: Ensure proper tire inflation, timely oil changes, and engine tune-ups to optimize fuel efficiency and reduce emissions.</li></ul> 3. Community-Level Implementation Strategies<ul><li>Neighborhood transportation forums: Participate in monthly community meetings to organize local carpooling networks and route optimization.</li><li>School run initiatives: Join or establish 'walking bus' groups for children's school commutes, reducing morning traffic congestion by up to 25% around school zones.</li><li>Support local businesses: Prioritize shopping within walking distance to reduce unnecessary vehicle trips for errands.</li><li>Advocate for improved infrastructure: Sign petitions and attend city council meetings to support expanded public transportation routes and improved cycling infrastructure.</li></ul> 4. Long-Term Collective Goals<ul><li>Reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips by 40% within two years.</li><li>Decrease overall traffic-related carbon emissions by 30% within three years.</li><li>Achieve 50% of all commutes using sustainable transportation methods by 2025.</li><li>Support the transition to electric vehicles by advocating for more charging stations throughout the city.</li></ul> 5. Benefits to Our Community<ul><li>Health improvements: Reducing traffic emissions can lower rates of respiratory illnesses by up to 15% and decrease related healthcare costs by approximately $3.2 million annually.</li><li>Economic advantages: Less congestion means reduced fuel consumption, saving the average commuter about $750 annually in transportation costs.</li><li>Enhanced quality of life: Decreased noise pollution, cleaner air, and safer streets create more livable neighborhoods and increase property values by up to 8%.</li><li>Climate resilience: Lowering our city's carbon footprint helps mitigate climate change impacts like extreme weather events that disproportionately affect urban areas.</li><li>Community cohesion: Shared transportation initiatives foster stronger neighborhood connections and social networks.</li></ul> 6. Monitoring Progress and Reporting<ul><li>Track your personal carbon reduction through the City Climate App.</li><li>Report transportation infrastructure issues via the municipal website or hotline (555-GREEN-CITY).</li><li>Participate in quarterly citizen surveys to help measure the effectiveness of these initiatives.</li><li>Share success stories and challenges at community forums to help refine these guidelines.</li></ul> Contact Information:For further assistance with implementing these guidelines or to suggest improvements, please contact:City Sustainability Office Email: sustainability@ourcity.gov Phone: 555-123-4567 Website: www.ourcity.gov/sustainable-transport Together, we can transform our city into a model of sustainable urban living while enjoying the numerous benefits of cleaner air, healthier lives, and a more connected community.

Question 2 - Answer - EC

The candidate demonstrates excellent mastery of the set of guidelines text type, with clear section headings, numbered points, and appropriate bullet points. The response comprehensively addresses traffic emissions, presents practical measures at individual and community levels, and articulates multiple benefits. The formal register is consistently maintained with an instructive tone that effectively engages the target audience of fellow citizens.

Question 3 - MaximumMarks -30

A building of great cultural significance has fallen into a state of neglect. The local council is now proposing to demolish it and replace it with a public park. You want to stop the council from going ahead with this plan. Write a text in which you explain why you oppose the demolition, suggest an alternative use for the building, and justify why your suggestion would be more useful for the community. Choose ONE of the text types from the options below.<ul><li>Email</li><li>Letter to the editor</li><li>Set of guidelines</li></ul>

Question 3 - Answer

LETTER TO THE EDITOR September 15, 2023 The Editor The Daily Chronicle 15 Main Street Riverside RS8 4TL Dear Editor, Re: Preserving Our Heritage: A Case Against the Demolition of the Old Town Hall I am writing to express my profound concern regarding the local council's proposal to demolish the Old Town Hall, a building of immense cultural significance in our community, and replace it with a public park. While I appreciate the council's intention to create more green spaces, I strongly believe that demolishing this historic landmark would be an irreversible mistake that future generations would come to regret. The Old Town Hall has stood as a testament to our town's rich history for over 150 years. Its Victorian architecture, with its distinctive clock tower and ornate stonework, represents a craftsmanship rarely seen in modern buildings. More importantly, this structure has been the backdrop to countless significant events in our town's history – from civil rights movements to cultural celebrations that have shaped our community's identity. Demolishing such a monument would effectively erase a vital chapter of our collective memory and heritage. Furthermore, we must consider the environmental impact of demolition. Studies consistently show that repurposing existing buildings is far more environmentally friendly than demolition and new construction. The embodied carbon in the Old Town Hall's structure took decades to accumulate, and destroying it would release significant amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. If the council is genuinely concerned with environmental benefits, preservation should be prioritized over demolition. Instead of destroying this invaluable piece of our heritage, I propose transforming the Old Town Hall into a Community Cultural Center. This multipurpose space could house a local history museum on the ground floor, showcasing artifacts and photographs that tell the story of our town. The upper floors could be converted into flexible spaces for art exhibitions, workshops, community meetings, and educational programs. The grand hall, once used for town assemblies, could serve as a performance venue for local musicians, theater groups, and cultural events. This alternative would provide numerous benefits that a park simply cannot offer. Firstly, it would preserve our cultural heritage while giving it new purpose and relevance for today's community. Secondly, a Cultural Center would create year-round opportunities for community engagement regardless of weather conditions – something a park cannot guarantee in our climate. Thirdly, such a center would provide educational opportunities, fostering a deeper understanding of local history among younger generations while offering spaces for skill development and artistic expression. From an economic perspective, a Community Cultural Center could become a sustainable enterprise. Spaces could be rented for events, exhibitions could charge modest entrance fees, and a café could provide refreshments while creating local jobs. The center would likely attract visitors from neighboring communities, boosting local businesses and tourism. These economic benefits would far exceed those of another public park, especially considering we already have three parks within walking distance of the town center. I understand that rehabilitation requires investment, but I urge the council to consider grants from heritage organizations, crowdfunding initiatives, and public-private partnerships to finance this project. The long-term benefits – cultural, educational, social, and economic – would far outweigh the initial costs. By preserving and repurposing the Old Town Hall, we would demonstrate our commitment to honoring our past while creating new opportunities for our community's future. I hope the council will reconsider its proposal and engage in a broader consultation with residents about alternative uses for this irreplaceable landmark. Yours sincerely, J. Thompson Local resident and heritage advocate

Question 3 - Answer - EC

The response demonstrates excellence in addressing all aspects of the task. The candidate has powerfully articulated opposition to the demolition with well-reasoned arguments about historical, cultural, and environmental value. The alternative proposal is thoroughly developed with specific implementation details, and the justification shows deep understanding of community needs and benefits. The letter's formal structure is impeccable, maintaining appropriate register throughout.

IB ENGLISH B HL, Paper 1, November, 2022, TZ0, Solved Past Paper