Imagine if you've only ever learned history from the perspective of your own country. Then, one day, you read a textbook from another country. You'd likely find that some events are represented very differently. This is a simplistic example of the need for decolonization - to understand and appreciate diverse perspectives.
Imagine two chefs, one trained in Italian cuisine and the other in Indian. If they share their techniques and ingredients, they can create a fusion dish that includes elements from both culinary traditions. That's like indigenization in knowledge - blending different systems to enrich our understanding.
What might a decolonized, indigenized TOK course and curriculum look like? How can these processes influence the entire IB Diploma curriculum?
This would involve deconstructing colonial knowledge and upholding the value of Indigenous ways of knowing. Doing one without the other can result in tokenism or criticisms without alternatives, which revert back to the default state.
For example, if a TOK curriculum started including texts from African philosophers without explaining the historical context and the philosophers' impact on the local culture, that could be seen as tokenism. If instead, the curriculum involves an in-depth understanding of different cultural philosophies and their interconnectedness, it would reflect true decolonization and indigenization.
An example of Indigenous knowledge can be seen in the Potlatch tradition of the Pacific Northwest First Nations. It is a social event involving ceremony, resource sharing, and knowledge transfer. However, the Canadian government banned Potlatch in 1884 to undermine Indigenous acculturation and knowledge transfer. The ban was lifted in 1951.
Just like Potlatch, many traditions around the world have been suppressed, their importance being realized and revived only recently.
Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Theory of Knowledge. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 🌟
Imagine if you've only ever learned history from the perspective of your own country. Then, one day, you read a textbook from another country. You'd likely find that some events are represented very differently. This is a simplistic example of the need for decolonization - to understand and appreciate diverse perspectives.
Imagine two chefs, one trained in Italian cuisine and the other in Indian. If they share their techniques and ingredients, they can create a fusion dish that includes elements from both culinary traditions. That's like indigenization in knowledge - blending different systems to enrich our understanding.
What might a decolonized, indigenized TOK course and curriculum look like? How can these processes influence the entire IB Diploma curriculum?
This would involve deconstructing colonial knowledge and upholding the value of Indigenous ways of knowing. Doing one without the other can result in tokenism or criticisms without alternatives, which revert back to the default state.
For example, if a TOK curriculum started including texts from African philosophers without explaining the historical context and the philosophers' impact on the local culture, that could be seen as tokenism. If instead, the curriculum involves an in-depth understanding of different cultural philosophies and their interconnectedness, it would reflect true decolonization and indigenization.
An example of Indigenous knowledge can be seen in the Potlatch tradition of the Pacific Northwest First Nations. It is a social event involving ceremony, resource sharing, and knowledge transfer. However, the Canadian government banned Potlatch in 1884 to undermine Indigenous acculturation and knowledge transfer. The ban was lifted in 1951.
Just like Potlatch, many traditions around the world have been suppressed, their importance being realized and revived only recently.
Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Theory of Knowledge. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 🌟