Hello Young Explorer! Let's dive into a thrilling journey of art, mystery, and the pursuit of knowledge. We're going to be art detectives for a while, and guess what? We're taking a cue from the masters! ๐ต๏ธโ๏ธ๐ผ๏ธ๐จ
Art has drama! Beyond just what you see, there's a story, a controversy and sometimes a good deal of detective work. Art communities (our fellow detectives) often debate about what constitutes valid evidence and how to reach a consensus. Think about how in your favorite detective show, everyone has to agree on who the bad guy is. Art is the same, but with more paint and fewer handcuffs.
Here's an example. A mysterious painting appeared in Paris in 2016. The question was - is it an original, lost masterpiece by Leonardo da Vinci, or a brilliant forgery? Art history experts and forensic scientists were called upon.
In the end, after a few months, they said "Yes, it's a Leonardo!" and valued it at a whopping 15 million euros! Can you imagine finding a forgotten doodle in your notebook worth millions?๐๏ธ๐ฐ
So how do experts authenticate art? They look at a lot of things. Is the technique right for the time period? Does the style match the artist's? They study everything from brushstrokes, ink blobs, shadows, and even writing on the canvas.
For instance, if the ink on the drawing is pooling in a way that is unmistakably 'da Vinci-esque', that's a clue. But would you spend 15 million dollars just because the ink looks right? That's like buying a sports car because you like the shape of its headlights.
But here's a thought: who can argue with these aesthetic judgments? Does your opinion count if you're not an expert? It's like questioning your teacher's marking scheme because you feel your answer was right. Tricky, right?
Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Theory of Knowledge. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 ๐
Hello Young Explorer! Let's dive into a thrilling journey of art, mystery, and the pursuit of knowledge. We're going to be art detectives for a while, and guess what? We're taking a cue from the masters! ๐ต๏ธโ๏ธ๐ผ๏ธ๐จ
Art has drama! Beyond just what you see, there's a story, a controversy and sometimes a good deal of detective work. Art communities (our fellow detectives) often debate about what constitutes valid evidence and how to reach a consensus. Think about how in your favorite detective show, everyone has to agree on who the bad guy is. Art is the same, but with more paint and fewer handcuffs.
Here's an example. A mysterious painting appeared in Paris in 2016. The question was - is it an original, lost masterpiece by Leonardo da Vinci, or a brilliant forgery? Art history experts and forensic scientists were called upon.
In the end, after a few months, they said "Yes, it's a Leonardo!" and valued it at a whopping 15 million euros! Can you imagine finding a forgotten doodle in your notebook worth millions?๐๏ธ๐ฐ
So how do experts authenticate art? They look at a lot of things. Is the technique right for the time period? Does the style match the artist's? They study everything from brushstrokes, ink blobs, shadows, and even writing on the canvas.
For instance, if the ink on the drawing is pooling in a way that is unmistakably 'da Vinci-esque', that's a clue. But would you spend 15 million dollars just because the ink looks right? That's like buying a sports car because you like the shape of its headlights.
But here's a thought: who can argue with these aesthetic judgments? Does your opinion count if you're not an expert? It's like questioning your teacher's marking scheme because you feel your answer was right. Tricky, right?
Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Theory of Knowledge. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 ๐