Alright, psychology enthusiasts! We're about to journey into the world of resilience. Imagine it like a superhero power that helps people bounce back after tough times. Cool, right? Our story starts back in time, shortly after World War II. As the world was picking up the pieces, psychologists started digging into this phenomenon called resilience.
The first key observation? Kids usually didn't show signs of traumatic shock if their parents were around. Kind of like how you feel safer when you know your folks are in the next room while you're watching a horror movie. This highlighted that children’s reactions are often shaped by their caregivers (Masten, 2014).
Fast forward to 1983, a super-tough time for Australia with destructive bushfires causing loss of lives and buildings. Psychologist McFarlane decided to study the impact on 808 children during the 26 months following this horrific event.
Now, this study was kind of like using a pair of binoculars; the researchers didn't interview the kids directly. Instead, they relied on parents' and teachers' reports to understand the kids' feelings. It raises some ethical questions, doesn't it? Like, wouldn't it be more accurate to ask the kids directly?
Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Psychology SL. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 🌟
Alright, psychology enthusiasts! We're about to journey into the world of resilience. Imagine it like a superhero power that helps people bounce back after tough times. Cool, right? Our story starts back in time, shortly after World War II. As the world was picking up the pieces, psychologists started digging into this phenomenon called resilience.
The first key observation? Kids usually didn't show signs of traumatic shock if their parents were around. Kind of like how you feel safer when you know your folks are in the next room while you're watching a horror movie. This highlighted that children’s reactions are often shaped by their caregivers (Masten, 2014).
Fast forward to 1983, a super-tough time for Australia with destructive bushfires causing loss of lives and buildings. Psychologist McFarlane decided to study the impact on 808 children during the 26 months following this horrific event.
Now, this study was kind of like using a pair of binoculars; the researchers didn't interview the kids directly. Instead, they relied on parents' and teachers' reports to understand the kids' feelings. It raises some ethical questions, doesn't it? Like, wouldn't it be more accurate to ask the kids directly?
Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Psychology SL. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 🌟
AI Assist
Expand