Theory of Knowledge
Theory of Knowledge
13
Chapters
165
Notes
Chapter 1 - Knowledge & The Knower(Core)
Chapter 1 - Knowledge & The Knower(Core)
Chapter 2 - Knowledge & Technology(Optional)
Chapter 2 - Knowledge & Technology(Optional)
Chapter 3 - Knowledge & Language(Optional)
Chapter 3 - Knowledge & Language(Optional)
Chapter 4 - Knowledge & Politics(Optional)
Chapter 4 - Knowledge & Politics(Optional)
Chapter 5 - Knowledge & Religion(Optional)
Chapter 5 - Knowledge & Religion(Optional)
Chapter 6 - Knowledge & Indigenous Societies(Optional)
Chapter 6 - Knowledge & Indigenous Societies(Optional)
Chapter 7 - History(AoK)
Chapter 7 - History(AoK)
Chapter 8 - The Human Sciences(AoK)
Chapter 8 - The Human Sciences(AoK)
Chapter 9 - The Natural Sciences(AoK)
Chapter 9 - The Natural Sciences(AoK)
Chapter 10 - The Arts(AoK)
Chapter 10 - The Arts(AoK)
Chapter 11 - Mathematics(AoK)
Chapter 11 - Mathematics(AoK)
Chapter 12 - ToK Exhibition
Chapter 12 - ToK Exhibition
Chapter 13 - ToK Essay
Chapter 13 - ToK Essay
IB Resources
Chapter 8 - The Human Sciences(AoK)
Theory of Knowledge
Theory of Knowledge

Chapter 8 - The Human Sciences(AoK)

Understanding Replicability & Reproducibility In Human Sciences

Word Count Emoji
751 words
Reading Time Emoji
4 mins read
Updated at Emoji
Last edited onย 5th Nov 2024

Table of content

Understanding key concepts

  • Reproducibility: The repeatability of a study using the same methodology. ๐Ÿ”„

    • ๐ŸŽฎ For example, let's consider a video game where you're attempting a specific challenge with the same character, same controls, and same settings. If you succeed multiple times, the results are reproducible.
  • Replicability: The possibility of obtaining the same or similar results under different experimental and methodological conditions. ๐Ÿ”€

    • ๐Ÿ’ป Think about trying to recreate a beautiful digital art piece someone else made. If you can achieve a similar result using different software, tools, or techniques, your work is replicable.

These two concepts form the foundation of the scientific method. However, it's been suggested that many findings, particularly in psychology, are not replicable, causing an "academic crisis."

Lack of replication studies

๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ”ฌ One major issue is the scarcity of replication studies. Original research often gets more credit than replicating an existing one, deterring researchers from replication studies.

  • ๐ŸŒณ Imagine planting a seed versus watering an already grown tree. Original research is planting a new seed (more credit), while replicating is watering the tree (less recognized).

The 'publish or perish' culture

๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ’จ Academics often feel pressured to frequently publish work for career advancement, leading to questionable research practices and potentially flawed findings.

  • โฑ๐Ÿ’ฅ Picture yourself in a race against time to build a LEGO tower. In the rush, you might compromise the tower's stability just to make it taller, faster. Similarly, the 'publish or perish' culture can compromise the integrity of research.

Unlock the Full Content! File Is Locked Emoji

Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Theory of Knowledge. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 ๐ŸŒŸ

Nail IB's App Icon
IB Resources
Chapter 8 - The Human Sciences(AoK)
Theory of Knowledge
Theory of Knowledge

Chapter 8 - The Human Sciences(AoK)

Understanding Replicability & Reproducibility In Human Sciences

Word Count Emoji
751 words
Reading Time Emoji
4 mins read
Updated at Emoji
Last edited onย 5th Nov 2024

Table of content

Understanding key concepts

  • Reproducibility: The repeatability of a study using the same methodology. ๐Ÿ”„

    • ๐ŸŽฎ For example, let's consider a video game where you're attempting a specific challenge with the same character, same controls, and same settings. If you succeed multiple times, the results are reproducible.
  • Replicability: The possibility of obtaining the same or similar results under different experimental and methodological conditions. ๐Ÿ”€

    • ๐Ÿ’ป Think about trying to recreate a beautiful digital art piece someone else made. If you can achieve a similar result using different software, tools, or techniques, your work is replicable.

These two concepts form the foundation of the scientific method. However, it's been suggested that many findings, particularly in psychology, are not replicable, causing an "academic crisis."

Lack of replication studies

๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ”ฌ One major issue is the scarcity of replication studies. Original research often gets more credit than replicating an existing one, deterring researchers from replication studies.

  • ๐ŸŒณ Imagine planting a seed versus watering an already grown tree. Original research is planting a new seed (more credit), while replicating is watering the tree (less recognized).

The 'publish or perish' culture

๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ’จ Academics often feel pressured to frequently publish work for career advancement, leading to questionable research practices and potentially flawed findings.

  • โฑ๐Ÿ’ฅ Picture yourself in a race against time to build a LEGO tower. In the rush, you might compromise the tower's stability just to make it taller, faster. Similarly, the 'publish or perish' culture can compromise the integrity of research.

Unlock the Full Content! File Is Locked Emoji

Dive deeper and gain exclusive access to premium files of Theory of Knowledge. Subscribe now and get closer to that 45 ๐ŸŒŸ